Shipyard

Security Embedded from Design.
Compliance-Ready Delivery.

Meet IACS UR E26/E27 requirements from the design stage
and deliver vessels with verified security.

Challenges

Challenges Facing Shipyards

IACS UR E26 mandates cybersecurity integration from the design stage
Surging workload to verify CBS equipment security across multiple vendors
Comprehensive security testing before sea trials and asset inventory maintenance post-delivery
Risk of vessel delivery delays due to security deficiencies
0%
Class approval timeline reduction
with CYTUR adoption
Solution

Solutions CYTUR Provides

CYTUR-TM™

Threat Modeler

Digital security design tool for vessels

Generates virtual network maps from design data and simulates zone-by-zone attack propagation paths to proactively identify design vulnerabilities.

Zone-based network visualization & attack simulation
IACS UR E26/E27 automated risk assessment reports
Incident propagation path containment strategies
CYTUR-ASA™ + SCS

Attack Surface Analysis + Asset Management

Equipment security verification & CBS unified management

Analyzes per-equipment attack surfaces with AI and centrally manages the security status of all CBS assets. Establishes a vendor security verification framework.

Bayesian AI threat probability prediction
Unified CBS asset management · Vendor gap analysis
Automated compliance documentation · Class reports
CYTUR-SC™

Scanner

Automated sea trial security verification

Automatically scans onboard networks during sea trials to identify discrepancies between design and actual configuration, and generates class submission evidence.

Automated onboard CBS asset discovery · Change tracking
Design vs. actual configuration discrepancy identification
Automated class submission verification evidence
CYTUR-TI™

Threat Intelligence

Pre-check planned equipment exposure

Pre-screens planned equipment for CVE and dark web exposure, supporting decisions to replace or remediate at-risk components.

CVE & external exposure lookup for planned equipment
Dark web exposure monitoring for equipment manufacturers
Security intelligence-informed equipment selection at design stage
Workflow

Newbuild Security Implementation Process

01

Design-Phase Threat Modeling

TI pre-checks equipment intelligence →
TM performs network design and attack simulation.

02

Equipment Security Verification

ASA analyzes per-equipment attack surfaces →
SCS performs vendor security gap analysis and unified asset management.

03

Automated Sea Trial Verification

SC automatically scans onboard networks.
Identifies design vs. actual discrepancies and initiates corrective actions.

04

Automated Class Certification Documentation

Based on SCS + SC verification results,
auto-generates IACS UR E26/E27 class submission documents for delivery.

Value

Expected Outcomes

⚡
40% Faster Approval
Automated verification
and documentation
🛡️
Zero Delivery Delay Risk
Proactive security
flaw elimination
🔗
Unified Vendor Verification
Centralized multi-vendor
management
🏆
Secure by Design
Security-embedded
differentiation
Get Started

Start Securing Your Newbuilds

See how to embed security from design through delivery.

Book a Demo → Contact Sales