Shipyard

Security Built-in from Design.
Compliance-Ready Delivery.

Meet IACS UR E26/E27 requirements from the design stage
and deliver vessels with verified security.

Challenges

Challenges Facing Shipyards

IACS UR E26 mandates cybersecurity implementation from the design stage
Surging workload to verify CBS equipment security integrity from multiple vendors
Comprehensive security testing required before sea trials, plus asset inventory maintenance after delivery
Risk of vessel delivery delays due to security deficiencies
0%
Reduction in class approval
timelines with CYTUR
Solution

Solutions CYTUR Provides

CYTUR-TM™

Threat Modeler

Digital Security Design Tool for Ships

Generates virtual network maps from design data and simulates zone-by-zone attack propagation paths to proactively identify design vulnerabilities.

Zone-based network visualization & attack simulation
IACS UR E26/E27 automated risk assessment reports
Incident propagation path mitigation strategy
CYTUR-ASA™ + SCS

Attack Surface Analysis + Asset Management

Equipment Security Verification & CBS Management

Analyzes per-equipment attack surfaces with AI and centrally manages security status across all CBS assets. Establishes vendor security verification frameworks.

Bayesian AI threat probability prediction
Unified CBS asset management & vendor gap analysis
Compliance documentation automation & class reports
CYTUR-SC™

Scanner

Automated Sea Trial Security Verification

Auto-scans the onboard network during sea trials, identifies discrepancies between design and actual configuration, and generates class submission evidence.

Auto-discovery of onboard CBS assets & change tracking
Design vs. actual configuration gap identification
Auto-generated class submission verification evidence
CYTUR-TI™

Threat Intelligence

Pre-installation Equipment Exposure Check

Verifies CVE and dark web exposure of planned equipment before installation, supporting replacement or remediation decisions for high-risk items.

CVE & external exposure lookup for planned equipment
Equipment vendor dark web exposure monitoring
Security intelligence integration into design-stage equipment selection
Workflow

Newbuild Security Implementation Process

01

Design-Phase Threat Modeling

TI for equipment intelligence pre-check →
TM for network design and attack simulation.

02

Equipment Security Verification

ASA for per-equipment attack surface analysis →
SCS for vendor security gap analysis and centralized asset management.

03

Automated Sea Trial Verification

SC auto-scans the onboard network.
Identifies design vs. actual configuration gaps and applies corrections.

04

Auto-generated Class Certification Documents

Based on SCS + SC verification results,
auto-generates IACS UR E26/E27 class submission documents for delivery.

Value

Expected Impact

40% Faster Class Approval
Automated verification
and documentation
🛡️
Zero Delivery Delay Risk
Proactive security
flaw elimination
🔗
Unified Vendor Verification
Centralized management
of multiple vendors
🏆
Secure by Design
Security-embedded
differentiation
Get Started

Start Securing Your Newbuilds

See how to embed security from design to delivery.